HTF Market Intelligence added research publication document on Global Data Resiliency Market breaking major business segments and highlighting wider level geographies to get deep dive analysis on market data. The study is a perfect balance bridging both qualitative and quantitative information of Data Resiliency market. The study provides valuable market size data for historical (Volume** & Value) from 2016 to 2020 which is estimated and forecasted till 2026*. Some are the key & emerging players that are part of coverage and have being profiled are Acronis, Asigra, Ca Technologies, Carbonite, Centurylink, Commvault, Ibm, Micro Focus, Microsoft, Netapp, Quest Software, Unitrends, Veeam, Veritas Technologies & Vmware.

1. External Factor Analysis
An external analysis looks at the wider business environment that affects the business. This industry assessment covers all the factors that are outside the control. It includes both the micro and macro environmental factors.

MACRO ENVIRONMENT: In-depth coverage on Factors such governmental laws, social construct and cultural norms, environmental conditions, economic, and technology.

MICRO ENVIRONMENT: Factors highlighting the rivalry of the competition.

2. Growth & Margins

Players that are having stellar growth track record is a must see view in the study that Analyst have covered. From 2014 to 2019, some of the company have shown enormous sales figures, with net income going doubled in that period with operating as well as gross margins constantly expanding. The rise of gross margins over past few years directs strong pricing power of the competitive companies in the industry for its products or offering, over and above the increase in the cost of goods sold.

3. Ambitious growth plans & rising competition?

Industry players are planning to introduce new products launch into various markets around the globe considering applications / end use . Examining some latest innovative products that are vital and may be introduced in EMEA markets in last quarter 2020. Considering all round development activities of Acronis, Asigra, Ca Technologies, Carbonite, Centurylink, Commvault, Ibm, Micro Focus, Microsof, Netapp, Quest Software, Unitrends, Veeam, Veritas Technologies & Vmware, some players profiles are worth attention seeking.

4. Where the Data Resiliency Industry is today

Though latest year might not be that encouraging as market segments especially , Small & Medium Enterprises (Smes), Large Enterprises, Industry Segmentation, Bfsi, It & Telecommunication, Government, Public Sector, Retail & Consumer Goods have shown modest gains, growth scenario could have been changed if Acronis, Asigra, Ca Technologies, Carbonite, Centurylink, Commvault, Ibm, Micro Focus, Microsof, Netapp, Quest Software, Unitrends, Veeam, Veritas Technologies & Vmware would have plan ambitious move earlier. Unlike past, but decent valuation and emerging investment cycle to progress in the North America Country (United States, Canada), South America, Asia Country (China, Japan, India, Korea), Europe Country (Germany, UK, France, Italy), Other Country (Middle East, Africa, GCC) ., many growth opportunities ahead for the companies in 2020, it looks descent today but stronger returns would be expected beyond.

Insights that Study is offering :

• Market Revenue splits by most promising business segments. [By Type (, Small & Medium Enterprises (Smes), Large Enterprises, Industry Segmentation, Bfsi, It & Telecommunication, Government, Public Sector, Retail & Consumer Goods), By Application and any other business Segment if applicable within scope of report]
• Market Share & Sales Revenue by Key Players & Local Emerging Regional Players. [Some of the players covered in the study are Acronis, Asigra, Ca Technologies, Carbonite, Centurylink, Commvault, Ibm, Micro Focus, Microsof, Netapp, Quest Software, Unitrends, Veeam, Veritas Technologies & Vmware]
• A separate section on Entropy to gain useful insights on leaders aggressiveness towards market [Merger & Acquisition / Recent Investment and Key Development Activity Including seed funding]
• Competitive Analysis: Company profile of listed players with separate SWOT Analysis, Overview, Product/Services Specification, Headquarter, Downstream Buyers and Upstream Suppliers.
• Gap Analysis by Region. Country break-up will help you dig out Trends and opportunity lying in specific territory of your business interest.

Author
HTF Market Report is a wholly owned brand of HTF market Intelligence Consulting Private Limited. HTF Market Report global research and market intelligence consulting organization is uniquely positioned to not only identify growth opportunities but to also empower and inspire you to create visionary growth strategies for futures, enabled by our extraordinary depth and breadth of thought leadership, research, tools, events and experience that assist you for making goals into a reality. Our understanding of the interplay between industry convergence, Mega Trends, technologies and market trends provides our clients with new business models and expansion opportunities. We are focused on identifying the “Accurate Forecast” in every industry we cover so our clients can reap the benefits of being early market entrants and can accomplish their “Goals & Objectives”.

Google Cloud Strengthens India Leadership Team

Google Cloud has appointed Anil Valluri, a veteran technology executive with deep experience in the Indian market, as Senior Director for Google Cloud India. Valluri joins from NetApp, where he served as President of India and SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) operations, a role in which he led the cloud data services company’s regional business across banking, telecommunications, public sector, and manufacturing verticals.

Who Is Anil Valluri?

Valluri brings a multi-decade track record of leading large technology organizations in India. Before NetApp, he served as Vice President and Managing Director for Sun Microsystems in India. He also spent time as Entrepreneur-in-Residence at Artiman Ventures, a Bay Area-based venture capital firm focused on white-space investments — opportunities in markets not yet addressed by existing products or companies.

Throughout his career, Valluri has been involved in major technology transitions for enterprise customers in India, particularly in regulated and capital-intensive sectors such as financial services, telecom, and manufacturing.

His Role at Google Cloud India

In his new position, Valluri will focus on three priorities:

• Deepening customer engagement — working closely with enterprises already using Google Cloud and bringing new organizations onto the platform.
• Expanding strategic partnerships — growing the ecosystem of system integrators, ISVs, and technology partners that deliver Google Cloud solutions in India.
• Accelerating data-led innovation — helping Indian businesses leverage Google Cloud’s data analytics, AI, and machine learning capabilities to drive competitive advantage.

Karan Bajwa, Managing Director of Google Cloud India, commented on the appointment: “Valluri has led some of the biggest technology MNCs in India and his experience will be invaluable as we continue our charter to help companies solve their most complex business and technology challenges.”

Valluri himself noted the broader opportunity: “Cloud is the next big transition in the technology industry and Google has been making major strides in this space. I’m excited for this new opportunity to help businesses of all sizes in India succeed in this rapidly digitizing economy.”

Google Cloud’s Growing India Footprint

The appointment comes at a period of significant investment by Google Cloud in the Indian market. As of early 2020, Google Cloud had announced plans to open a new cloud region in Delhi, which would complement its existing Mumbai region — launched in 2017. A second Indian cloud region increases redundancy options for customers, reduces latency for northern and central India workloads, and satisfies data residency requirements for regulated industries.

Google Cloud’s existing customer base in India at the time of this announcement spanned multiple industries and included organizations such as Dr Reddy’s Laboratories, IndiaMart, Hero MotoCorp, ICICI Prudential, L&T Finance, LIC HFL, Manipal Hospitals, OYO Hotels and Homes, Truecaller, and Wipro, among others.

Why This Hire Matters for Enterprise Cloud Adoption in India

Hiring an executive with Valluri’s profile signals Google Cloud’s intent to compete seriously for large enterprise and public sector contracts in India — segments where NetApp has historically had a strong footprint. His background in SAARC operations also suggests Google Cloud may be looking to grow its presence beyond India’s borders into neighboring markets.

For DevOps and cloud engineering teams evaluating Google Cloud Platform (GCP) as a strategic vendor, the expansion of Google’s regional infrastructure and local leadership team is a relevant signal. A dedicated Delhi region and senior regional leadership typically correlate with improved local support availability, faster escalation paths, and more regionally tailored professional services engagements.

Why IT Infrastructure Monitoring Matters

Infrastructure monitoring tools give operations teams continuous visibility into the health and performance of servers, networks, storage, applications, and cloud services. Without them, outages are detected by end users rather than by the team responsible for uptime. Key business drivers pushing adoption include:

• Shift to hybrid and multi-cloud architectures — Teams need a single pane of glass that spans on-premises hardware and cloud providers simultaneously.
• Rising complexity of microservices and containers — Ephemeral workloads require dynamic discovery and auto-instrumentation, capabilities older tools struggle to provide.
• Stricter compliance and SLA requirements — Financial services, healthcare, and government sectors demand audit trails and availability reporting.
• Cost of downtime — Unplanned outages carry significant financial and reputational risk, making proactive monitoring a clear ROI story.

Major Vendors in the Space

The following platforms appear consistently in enterprise evaluations and open-source shortlists. Each has a distinct positioning:

SolarWinds

SolarWinds offers a broad portfolio — Network Performance Monitor (NPM), Server & Application Monitor (SAM), and the unified Orion platform — that suits mid-market and enterprise environments with mixed on-premises infrastructure. Its agent-based and agentless collection options make it flexible for heterogeneous environments.

ManageEngine (OpManager)

ManageEngine’s OpManager provides network, server, and application monitoring with deep integration into the broader Zoho/ManageEngine ITSM ecosystem. It is a popular choice for organizations that want to correlate monitoring alerts with service desk tickets in a single vendor relationship.

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature open-source platform with enterprise-grade features including distributed monitoring, high-availability configurations, and flexible alerting. Because it carries no licensing cost, it sees strong adoption in cost-conscious environments and large-scale deployments where teams have the staff to manage it.

Paessler PRTG

PRTG’s sensor-based licensing model and polished dashboards make it especially accessible for smaller IT teams. It monitors networks, servers, applications, and IoT devices through a large library of pre-built sensors, and is commonly deployed in manufacturing and industrial environments.

Datadog

Datadog is a cloud-native, SaaS-delivered monitoring and observability platform. Its agent integrates with over 700 technologies out of the box, and it unifies infrastructure metrics, APM traces, log management, and synthetic monitoring in a single interface. It is commonly adopted by organizations with significant cloud or container footprints.

Nagios

Nagios Core is one of the oldest and most widely deployed open-source monitoring tools. Nagios XI, its commercial edition, adds a web UI, reporting, and configuration wizards. While its plugin ecosystem is enormous, teams often need to invest time in customization compared with newer all-in-one platforms.

Other Notable Vendors

• VMware Aria Operations (formerly vRealize Operations) — Deep integration with vSphere and VMware Cloud environments.
• PagerDuty — Primarily an incident management and on-call scheduling platform that aggregates alerts from monitoring tools rather than collecting metrics itself.
• Catchpoint — Focuses on digital experience monitoring (DEM), synthetic testing, and real-user monitoring from a global vantage-point network.
• LogicMonitor — SaaS-based infrastructure monitoring targeting managed service providers (MSPs) and enterprise IT teams with agentless, auto-discovered monitoring.
• ScienceLogic SL1 — Designed for large, complex environments with strong emphasis on AIOps-driven root-cause analysis and multi-tenant architectures.
• Kaseya VSA — An RMM (Remote Monitoring and Management) platform oriented toward MSPs managing customer endpoints and infrastructure.
• Micro Focus (now OpenText) Operations Bridge — Enterprise-grade AIOps and event correlation for large data centers.
• Ipswitch WhatsUp Gold — Network-focused monitoring with an accessible interface suited to SMB and mid-market teams.
• NetApp Cloud Insights — Infrastructure and storage performance analytics, especially strong in NetApp-heavy environments.
• TeamViewer / Xmatters — Typically used for remote access/support and alert notification workflows respectively, rather than as primary monitoring collectors.
• Virtual Instruments (now Virtana) — Specializes in hybrid infrastructure performance management, particularly storage and workload analytics.

Deployment Models

Cloud-Based (SaaS)

SaaS-delivered tools such as Datadog, LogicMonitor, and Catchpoint offload infrastructure management to the vendor. Benefits include rapid onboarding, automatic feature updates, elastic scaling, and no on-premises server footprint. The trade-off is that all telemetry travels to a third-party cloud, which can raise data residency or compliance concerns for regulated industries.

On-Premises

Self-hosted platforms like Zabbix, Nagios, and PRTG keep all data within the organization’s network. This is preferred when strict data sovereignty requirements apply, when airgapped environments must be monitored, or when a large existing data center makes SaaS egress costs prohibitive. The cost model shifts from subscription to staff time and infrastructure.

Industry Verticals and Use Cases

How to Evaluate an IT Infrastructure Monitoring Tool

Use the following criteria when shortlisting platforms for a proof of concept:

1. Coverage breadth — Does it natively monitor your OS types, hypervisors, network vendors, cloud providers, and SaaS applications without requiring custom scripting for every integration?
2. Scalability — Can the platform handle your current host count and project forward two to three years without a re-architecture?
3. Alerting and noise reduction — Does it support alert correlation, dependency-aware suppression, and anomaly detection to reduce alert fatigue?
4. Visualization and dashboards — Are out-of-the-box dashboards useful, and how easy is it to build custom views for different stakeholder audiences?
5. ITSM and ChatOps integrations — Does it route alerts to your ticketing system (Jira, ServiceNow) and messaging tools (Slack, Teams) natively?
6. Total cost of ownership — For open-source tools, factor in staffing and customization time. For SaaS, model cost against host count and data retention requirements.
7. Security and compliance posture — Review SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, or GDPR compliance documentation depending on your regulatory context.
8. Vendor support and community — A large community (Zabbix, Nagios) can offset the cost of formal support contracts; for critical SLAs, evaluate vendor response time commitments.

SWOT and PESTEL Considerations for Buyers

Market analysts apply SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) and PESTEL (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal) frameworks to assess market dynamics. From a practitioner’s perspective, these translate into practical buying considerations:

• Strengths to look for: Deep integration ecosystem, proven scalability, strong documentation.
• Weaknesses to watch: Vendor lock-in, opaque pricing, poor support for modern container environments in older platforms.
• Opportunities: AIOps capabilities that reduce mean time to detect (MTTD) and mean time to resolve (MTTR).
• Threats: Consolidation in the vendor landscape (acquisitions can shift roadmap priorities); open-source alternatives can erode the case for expensive licenses.
• Legal/compliance factors: Data residency laws (GDPR, CCPA) may mandate on-premises or region-specific SaaS deployments.
• Economic factors: Budget pressure drives interest in open-source and freemium tiers; cloud-native growth drives SaaS adoption.

Summary

The IT infrastructure monitoring tool market is large, mature, and still evolving rapidly — particularly as observability (metrics, logs, and traces in a unified platform) displaces traditional siloed monitoring approaches. Whether you are a small team evaluating Zabbix or PRTG for an on-premises data center, or an enterprise weighing Datadog against ScienceLogic for a multi-cloud deployment, the evaluation criteria above provide a practical starting framework. Pilot any shortlisted tool against your actual environment before committing to a licensing agreement.

NetApp Kills NKS on HCI and Cloud Volumes on HCI

In March 2020, NetApp announced it would end availability of two services — NetApp Kubernetes Service (NKS) on HCI and Cloud Volumes Service for On-Premises (Cloud Volumes on HCI) — effective April 20, 2020. The move was framed not as a retreat from Kubernetes, but as a strategic realignment toward a broader, distribution-agnostic approach to container orchestration across the company’s full product line.

According to a source close to the company cited by blocksandfiles.com, something new was already in preparation: “some very cool things in the works for NetApp and Kubernetes where there is more value than NKS was and is.” A formal announcement was expected within weeks of the initial disclosure.

Why NetApp Made the Change

NetApp’s customer communication at the time cited direct feedback from both partners and customers as a driver for the change. The company stated it would adopt a distribution-agnostic approach to Kubernetes, with the stated goal of making applications and their associated data highly available, portable, and manageable across on-premises infrastructure and public clouds — delivered through a software-defined set of data services.

The company was explicit that ending NKS on HCI and Cloud Volumes on HCI was intended to accelerate its Kubernetes strategy, not abandon it. The broader ambition was to transform its converged and hyperconverged storage platforms — including NetApp HCI — into a software-defined architecture capable of automating infrastructure for Kubernetes workloads, positioning NetApp as a leading on-premises hybrid cloud platform.

What NKS and Cloud Volumes Actually Were

NetApp Kubernetes Service (NKS)

NKS was a SaaS-based offering that allowed customers to provision and manage Kubernetes clusters across multiple environments:

• On-premises: NetApp HCI and FlexPod
• Public cloud: AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform (GCP)

The provisioning workflow handled load balancer creation, virtual instance configuration, and full Kubernetes deployment and configuration across each node in the cluster. End users could then spin up cloud-native projects using standard Kubernetes tooling, including kubectl configuration files.

Critics noted that NKS operated primarily at the application layer and was in direct competition with platforms such as Red Hat OpenShift — a position that raised questions about strategic fit for a storage-focused company.

Cloud Volumes on HCI

Cloud Volumes is NetApp’s approach to delivering file services — consumable by containerized and cloud-native applications — within public cloud environments. Key variants include:

• Cloud Volumes ONTAP: The ONTAP storage operating environment running in AWS and Azure
• Cloud Volumes Service for GCP: A managed file service for Google Cloud
• Cloud Volumes Service for On-Premises / Cloud Volumes on HCI: The now-discontinued on-premises variant

The discontinuation of the on-premises variant was interpreted by some analysts as evidence that customers were not yet ready for — or simply did not require — a hybrid, on-premises Cloud Volumes capability, and were content to continue running traditional ONTAP appliances on-premises.

NetApp’s HCI Platform: The Underlying Infrastructure

NetApp’s hyperconverged infrastructure product at the time was NetApp HCI, built on the SolidFire Elements storage platform. The broader converged portfolio included FlexPod and FlexPod SF, both of which use Cisco servers and networking. These are reference architectures jointly developed and validated by NetApp and Cisco, rather than tightly integrated proprietary appliances.

Industry Reaction: Strategic Sense or Retreat?

The Case for Refocusing

Chris Evans, a prominent data storage architect quoted by blocksandfiles.com, argued that the core capability of NKS was never the issue. The real question was whether NetApp — fundamentally a storage and data management company — should be in the business of workload orchestration at all, or whether it should instead focus on making workload management tools work better with its data services.

Evans suggested the more appropriate path was the latter: retaining NKS-derived capability within NetApp’s Fabric Orchestrator strategy to handle data movement and migration, rather than maintaining it as a standalone Kubernetes management product. He noted that the ongoing cost and engineering effort of keeping pace with upstream Kubernetes development had clearly been weighed and found too high relative to the return.

Questions Around Cloud Volumes on HCI

Evans expressed more concern about the retirement of Cloud Volumes on HCI, noting that it seemed to work against a hybrid data strategy where storage is agnostic and distributed across many locations. The implication is that customers either weren’t adopting the product in meaningful numbers, or the operational model wasn’t compelling enough to justify the overhead of maintaining it.

Analyst Speculation on HCI’s Future

An unnamed industry analyst quoted in the original report suggested that NetApp could exit the HCI market entirely within 12 months of this announcement, with COVID-19 market conditions potentially serving as cover for a strategic withdrawal. That prediction was speculative at the time of writing and should be treated as such.

What This Signals for NetApp’s Kubernetes Direction

The clearest signal from the announcement was that NetApp was moving away from building and operating its own Kubernetes distribution or management layer — a position that put it in competition with established players like Red Hat OpenShift and VMware Tanzu — and toward a role as an infrastructure and data services enabler for whatever Kubernetes distribution a customer chooses to run.

This distribution-agnostic posture aligns more naturally with NetApp’s core competency: providing persistent, portable, highly available storage and data management services to applications, regardless of where or how those applications are orchestrated. Projects like Trident, NetApp’s open-source dynamic storage provisioner for Kubernetes, reflect this direction — operating at the storage layer beneath the orchestration tier rather than competing with it.

Key Takeaways for DevOps and Platform Engineers

• NKS on HCI and Cloud Volumes on HCI were discontinued effective April 20, 2020.
• NetApp’s stated replacement strategy centers on distribution-agnostic Kubernetes support across ONTAP and its broader portfolio.
• The move reflects a shift away from competing in the Kubernetes management layer and toward enabling persistent data services across any Kubernetes distribution.
• Cloud Volumes ONTAP (AWS, Azure) and Cloud Volumes Service (GCP) remained active; only the on-premises variant was discontinued.
• Teams running NKS on HCI at the time of the announcement needed to plan migration to an alternative Kubernetes distribution and storage integration layer.

This article is based on reporting by blocksandfiles.com from March 2020 and reflects the state of NetApp’s product portfolio at that time. Product availability and strategy will have evolved since publication.

Overview

NetApp and Google Cloud deepened their strategic partnership in December 2019 with a set of coordinated product launches and validations aimed at helping enterprise customers manage data across hybrid and multicloud environments. The announcement covered three major deliverables: general availability of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, general availability of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP for Google Cloud, and validation of Anthos on NetApp HCI (Hyperconverged Infrastructure).

The partnership reflects a broader industry trend: enterprises increasingly need storage that combines cloud-native flexibility with the performance, data-protection, and governance capabilities historically associated with on-premises enterprise storage.

Why This Partnership Matters for Enterprise Hybrid Cloud

As organisations move workloads to public cloud, many find that commodity cloud storage falls short for performance-sensitive or compliance-driven applications. NetApp’s positioning as a “data authority for hybrid cloud” centers on providing consistent data services — replication, tiering, deduplication, snapshots, and encryption — regardless of where workloads run.

Deepak Mohan, Research Director for Cloud Infrastructure Services at IDC, noted at the time that a growing share of enterprise workloads deployed in cloud environments have a strong dependency on storage performance, and that organisations are increasingly prioritising tools that enable governance, automation, and data mobility. NetApp’s data services running natively on Google Cloud were positioned to address exactly those requirements.

What Was Announced

1. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud — General Availability

Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is a fully managed, cloud-native file storage service integrated directly into the Google Cloud console and billing. Key characteristics include:

• Protocol support: NFS and SMB, making it suitable for Linux and Windows workloads without re-architecting applications.
• Performance tiers: Multiple service levels to match throughput requirements with cost.
• Enterprise data protection: Snapshots, replication, and encryption at rest and in transit.
• Target workloads: Business-critical applications, databases, and analytics pipelines that require predictable, low-latency storage I/O.
• Regional expansion: At launch, the service became available in the United Kingdom region in addition to existing regions.

Roger Kjensrud, CTO of Impact (a partnership automation SaaS company), described using Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud to build an agile, enterprise-grade platform, noting that it simplified infrastructure management while allowing the team to focus on product development.

2. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP for Google Cloud — General Availability

Cloud Volumes ONTAP is NetApp’s flagship data management software running as a customer-managed instance in Google Cloud. Unlike Cloud Volumes Service (which is fully managed by NetApp), ONTAP gives teams direct control over the storage virtual machine and its configuration. Key capabilities include:

• Storage efficiencies: Inline deduplication, compression, and compaction to reduce cloud storage costs.
• Data protection: SnapMirror replication to sync data between on-premises ONTAP systems and Google Cloud, or between cloud regions.
• Data tiering: Automatically moves cold data to lower-cost Google Cloud Storage object storage.
• Unified management: Managed via NetApp Cloud Manager, giving a single pane of glass across on-premises and cloud deployments.
• Hybrid mobility: Consistent ONTAP APIs and tooling simplify lift-and-shift and cloud-bursting scenarios.

3. Anthos on NetApp HCI — Validated Support

Google Cloud’s Anthos is an application modernisation platform that lets teams deploy and manage containerised workloads consistently across on-premises infrastructure and Google Cloud. The December 2019 announcement confirmed that NetApp HCI had been validated as an on-premises hardware platform for running Anthos.

NetApp HCI is a disaggregated hyperconverged infrastructure system that separates compute and storage scaling — organisations can add compute nodes or storage nodes independently, rather than scaling both together as traditional HCI requires. Key capabilities relevant to the Anthos validation include:

• Hybrid cloud orchestration: NetApp Trident, an open source Container Storage Interface (CSI) driver, connects Kubernetes workloads on Anthos and NetApp HCI to NetApp storage services, including Google Cloud volumes, creating a unified hybrid storage fabric.
• Independent scaling: Add compute capacity for container workloads or storage capacity for persistent volumes without over-provisioning either resource.
• Broad platform support: NetApp HCI supports Anthos, upstream Kubernetes, VMware vSphere, and NetApp Kubernetes Service on the same underlying hardware, giving operations teams flexibility in their application platform choices.

Kevin Ichhpurani, Corporate Vice President for Global Ecosystem at Google Cloud, highlighted that the Anthos-on-NetApp-HCI validation gave customers more choice in validated on-premises hardware, reducing risk for enterprises adopting Anthos in regulated or latency-sensitive environments.

The NetApp Data Fabric Strategy

The announcements fit within NetApp’s broader “Data Fabric” concept: a consistent, policy-driven layer for data management that spans on-premises systems, edge locations, and multiple public clouds. The goal is to allow data to move freely to wherever it is most efficiently processed, while maintaining a single set of governance, compliance, and protection policies.

Anthony Lye, Senior Vice President and General Manager for Cloud Data Services at NetApp, framed the Google Cloud partnership as an extension of that mission — enabling organisations to take advantage of Google Cloud’s strengths in application development, analytics, and machine learning without sacrificing the data management capabilities they rely on in their on-premises environments.

Key Takeaways for DevOps and Platform Engineering Teams

• Persistent storage for GKE and Anthos: NetApp Trident’s CSI integration means Kubernetes workloads on Google Kubernetes Engine or on-premises Anthos can use NetApp volumes as persistent storage with full snapshot and replication support.
• Lift-and-shift path: SnapMirror replication between on-premises ONTAP and Cloud Volumes ONTAP on Google Cloud provides a low-disruption path for migrating NFS/SMB workloads to the cloud.
• Cost management: ONTAP’s storage efficiency features and data tiering to Google Cloud Storage can significantly reduce effective storage costs compared to running purely on persistent disk.
• Validated reference architecture: The NetApp HCI + Anthos validation reduces integration risk for organisations standardising on Anthos as their hybrid application platform.

Further Reading

For current product documentation, pricing, and regional availability, refer to the official NetApp and Google Cloud documentation portals, as product details will have evolved since this announcement in December 2019.

What Are Intelligent Business Process Management Suites (iBPMS)?

Intelligent Business Process Management Suites (iBPMS) extend traditional BPM platforms by embedding analytics, machine learning, real-time event processing, and collaboration capabilities directly into process automation workflows. Where classic BPM tools focused on modelling and executing structured, rule-based processes, iBPMS platforms can adapt to changing conditions, surface anomalies, and trigger responses with minimal human intervention.

For DevOps and IT operations teams, iBPMS concepts increasingly overlap with AIOps, observability platforms, and IT service management (ITSM) tooling. Many of the vendors listed in market research under the iBPMS label are tools that DevOps practitioners use daily for monitoring, alerting, and incident response.

Key Vendors in the iBPMS and IT Process Automation Space

The vendors named in research covering this market category span a broad range of IT operations and process automation use cases. Here is what each one actually does:

Monitoring and Observability Platforms

• Zabbix – Open-source infrastructure monitoring platform supporting network devices, servers, cloud resources, and applications. Widely used in enterprises that prefer self-hosted, cost-controlled monitoring.
• Nagios – One of the earliest open-source monitoring tools, providing host and service monitoring with a large ecosystem of community plugins. Nagios XI is the commercial variant.
• Paessler (PRTG) – Network monitoring tool focused on bandwidth, uptime, and device health, popular in mid-market IT environments.
• Datadog – SaaS-based observability platform covering infrastructure metrics, APM, log management, and synthetics. Strong integrations with cloud-native stacks.
• SolarWinds – Broad portfolio of IT management tools including network performance monitoring (NPM), ITSM (Service Desk), and database performance monitoring.
• LogicMonitor – Cloud-based infrastructure monitoring platform with automated device discovery and an extensive library of pre-built monitoring templates.
• ScienceLogic – Hybrid IT monitoring and AIOps platform targeting large enterprises and managed service providers.

Alerting and Incident Response

• PagerDuty – On-call management and incident response platform that aggregates alerts from monitoring tools and routes them to the right teams based on escalation policies.
• xMatters – Intelligent communications platform for incident management, integrating with monitoring and ITSM tools to automate notification workflows.
• Catchpoint – Digital experience monitoring platform focused on end-user experience, synthetic testing, and internet performance visibility.

IT Management and Remote Access

• ManageEngine – Suite of IT management products (from Zoho Corp) covering ITSM, endpoint management, network monitoring, and Active Directory management.
• TeamViewer – Remote access and support platform, also used for unattended endpoint monitoring and management in some enterprise deployments.
• Kaseya – IT management platform targeting managed service providers (MSPs), including remote monitoring and management (RMM) and PSA capabilities.
• Ipswitch (now part of Progress) – Network management and file transfer tools, including WhatsUp Gold for network monitoring.

Infrastructure and Virtualisation

• VMware – Leading virtualisation and cloud infrastructure vendor. VMware Aria (formerly vRealize) provides operations management, log analytics, and automation across private and hybrid cloud environments.
• NetApp – Storage and data management vendor; included in this category for its cloud data services and storage performance monitoring capabilities.
• Micro Focus (now OpenText) – Enterprise software portfolio including IT operations management (ITOM) and application delivery management tools.
• Virtual Instruments (now Virtana) – Infrastructure performance management, particularly for storage and hybrid cloud environments.

Market Segments and Regional Breakdown

Market research in this category typically segments the iBPMS and IT process automation market by deployment model (cloud vs. on-premises), organisation size (SMB vs. enterprise), and industry vertical (financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, retail, and public sector).

Geographic coverage in analyst reports for this space commonly spans:

• North America – United States, Canada, Mexico
• Europe – Germany, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Russia, Turkey, and others
• Asia-Pacific – China, Japan, India, South Korea, Australia, Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, and Indonesia
• South America – Brazil and others
• Middle East and Africa – GCC countries and Egypt

North America and Europe typically represent the largest revenue shares for enterprise IT management tooling, while Asia-Pacific has historically shown faster growth rates driven by digital transformation investment in China, India, and Southeast Asia. Specific figures should be sourced from a current, verified analyst report.

Key Evaluation Questions for DevOps Teams

If you are evaluating platforms in this space, the following questions are worth working through before selecting a vendor:

1. What is your primary use case? Infrastructure monitoring, application performance monitoring (APM), incident management, and business process automation are related but distinct problem spaces. Not every vendor excels at all of them.
2. Cloud-native or hybrid? Platforms like Datadog and LogicMonitor are SaaS-first. Zabbix and Nagios are self-hosted by default. VMware Aria and SolarWinds offer both. Match the deployment model to your operational constraints.
3. What does the integration ecosystem look like? In a DevOps toolchain, a monitoring or process automation platform lives alongside CI/CD pipelines, ticketing systems, chat tools, and cloud provider APIs. Evaluate integration depth, not just breadth.
4. How does the platform scale? Agent-based monitoring (Zabbix, Nagios) requires careful capacity planning at scale. Agentless and SaaS models shift that burden to the vendor but can introduce data egress and privacy considerations.
5. What is the total cost of ownership? Open-source tools have zero licence cost but non-trivial operational overhead. SaaS platforms have predictable per-host or per-metric pricing but costs can escalate significantly at enterprise scale.
6. How mature is the AIOps capability? Genuine anomaly detection, root-cause analysis, and noise reduction separate advanced platforms from those that simply badge existing features as AI. Look for concrete examples in proof-of-concept testing.

Why This Category Matters for DevOps Practitioners

The convergence of BPM, AIOps, and IT operations management reflects a broader shift: organisations are no longer satisfied with tools that simply report on what has happened. They want platforms that can predict failures, automate remediation, and optimise processes continuously without waiting for a human to read a dashboard.

For DevOps teams, this means the boundary between “monitoring” and “process automation” is blurring. Platforms like PagerDuty now offer workflow automation. Datadog offers workflow automation and case management. VMware Aria can trigger infrastructure changes based on performance policy violations. Understanding where a vendor sits on the spectrum from pure monitoring to full process orchestration is essential to avoiding tool sprawl and integration debt.

Further Reading

For current, verified market sizing and competitive positioning data in the iBPMS and IT operations management space, consult reports from recognised analyst firms such as Gartner, Forrester, or IDC. Vendor-published documentation and community forums (such as the Zabbix forums or Nagios Exchange) are also reliable starting points for hands-on technical evaluation.

NetApp, the data authority for hybrid cloud, announced updates to Trident, its automated provisioner solving the persistent storage challenge for containers, a new verified architecture for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform on NetApp HCI, as well as enhanced flexibility for DevOps on both NetApp Cloud Volumes for Google Cloud Platform and NetApp Cloud Volumes for AWS.

The announcement follows NetApp’s recent acquisition of StackPointCloud, an advanced Kubernetes-as-a-service platform that directly supports the application orchestration capabilities across clouds. Following the acquisition, NetApp launched the NetApp Kubernetes Service, a Universal Control Plane for Managed Kubernetes, which dramatically simplifies the deployment of a Kubernetes cluster to the cloud.

NetApp also recently announced new Ansible modules for Element, which provide integration for NetApp HCI and SolidFire solutions; ONTAP, which provides integrated solutions for NetApp AFF and FAS systems; and SANtricity®, which provides integrated solutions for NetApp E-Series systems. This new capability enables customers to use familiar tools to define and deploy consistent infrastructure for development, test, and production.

In-house developer teams play an important role in the ability of a business to pursue new revenue streams, but the long-standing cultural divide between development and operations has traditionally inhibited collaboration and led to slow development cycles. By creating data services that help build trust between developers and operations, NetApp aims to provide the tools that, together with DevOps techniques and methods, enable companies to transform this paradigm.

“Delivering business value from data often depends on developers’ ability to rapidly innovate through methods like DevOps, but organizations often lack the infrastructure to support the flexible, collaborative approach required for a true DevOps culture,” said Brad Anderson, SVP and GM, Cloud Infrastructure at NetApp.

“NetApp provides data products and services that are purpose-built to help developers and operations better align, while also enabling the technology independence that developers need to keep creating and driving value and strategic advantage for the business,” he added.