<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DevOps projects &#8211; Best DevOps</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.bestdevops.com/tag/devops-projects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.bestdevops.com</link>
	<description>Lets Learn, Do it &#38; Share! Thats a Best DevOps!!!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 10:42:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Why do your DevOps projects fail? Here’s why</title>
		<link>https://www.bestdevops.com/why-do-your-devops-projects-fail-heres-why/</link>
					<comments>https://www.bestdevops.com/why-do-your-devops-projects-fail-heres-why/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DevOps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Continuous Integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DevOps projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestdevops.com/?p=4906</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Source- techgenix.co Several businesses have opted for DevOps tools and processes that fit the framework. Unfortunately, few of them actually implement the workflow [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Source- <a href="http://techgenix.com/devops-projects-fail/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">techgenix.co</a></p>
<p>Several businesses have opted for DevOps tools and processes that fit the framework. Unfortunately, few of them actually implement the workflow with the fidelity necessary to increase team productivity.</p>
<div class="post_header single">
<p><span style="font-size: 0.95em;">According to a 2nd Watch report, companies must bring separate operating groups together as a single unit when transforming their business into a full-fledged DevOps organization.</span></p>
<p>Unfortunately, 78 per cent of IT professionals claimed their organizations still keep separate teams for operations and developments and managing infrastructure. These kinds of key mistakes often are the reason your DevOps projects fail.</p>
<p>But these are not the only reasons. Here are other common errors that could mean your DevOps projects will end up wasting your company time and money.</p>
<h3>Failure to use purposeful automation</h3>
<p>Organizations must adopt automation throughout the full development lifecycle for DevOps. This includes continuous integration, continuous delivery, and deployment for quality and velocity outcomes. Automation should not be done in silos like incident management or change management.</p>
<p>Only purposeful end-to-end automation sets the groundwork for successful DevOps implementation. Organizations need to completely automate the CD and CI pipeline. Simultaneously, they need to identify opportunities for automation throughout functions and processes.</p>
<h3>Wrong architecture evaluation</h3>
<p>DevOps projects cannot succeed without proper architectural support. DevOps reduces the time it takes to deploy different applications. Even when fully automated, if deployment consumes lots of time, there’s no value in automation.</p>
<p>Thus, DevOps teams must look at the architecture closely and ensure it’s loosely coupled. Why? Because this provides developers with the flexibility and freedom they require to deploy system parts independently and avoid breakage.</p>
<h3>No room for flexibility in DevOps processes</h3>
<p>Although organizations must comply with core DevOps principles for successful implementation, they must proactively adjust to enterprise demands. So companies need to conduct necessary internal adjustments in internal benchmarking for the main DevOps pillars to stay stable at the time of DevOps implementation.</p>
<p>Instrumenting codebases granularly and increasing the number of partitions offers greater flexibility and gives DevOps teams the power to go back and identify the primary cause of diversion and avoid any failed outcomes.</p>
<p>Keep in mind, however, that every adjustment needs to be done while staying inside the limits defined by the DevOps processes.</p>
<h3>Poor DevOps transformation</h3>
<p>When processes are not properly aligned across every team, the whole system may crumble. Every team must agree upon the process for DevOps to work. In several instances, executive level alignment is critical to bring everyone onto the same page.</p>
<p>Another reason why many DevOps projects fail is the overreliance on tools. Many businesses buy the latest tool in the market, thinking it will resolve all issues and magically help them attain DevOps. But the truth is, tools hold as much power as their implementation and usage.</p>
<p>So, companies must first define the people and processes involved along with the expected end state goal. After the organization agreement, tools must be chosen and implemented to automate DevOps as designed. The operations and developers must be on the same page.</p>
<h3>No connection to business outcomes</h3>
<p>Most of the time, IT leaders cannot convey the actual value DevOps creates for the customers of an organization.</p>
<p>The truth is, attempting to wow business leaders with technical jargon about DevOps and agile won’t work without solid results. That’s why many organizations fail at DevOps since the CIOs possessing experience in software fail to understand DevOps and agile jargon.</p>
<p>Thus, when tech leaders talk to senior business people regarding technology practices, they hardly pay attention to the market, or the impact and cost.</p>
<h3>Minimal attention paid to organizational changes</h3>
<p>Several DevOps projects and initiatives do not make much progress as they emphasize and the best and newest DevOps tools instead of communicating the impact of these processes and tools on an organization.</p>
<p>Convincing people to change can be challenging and DevOps is no different. In most cases, failure occurs due to the inability of people to change and learn.</p>
<p>However, the problem can be resolved by communicating the true value to customers. Leaders need to clearly state that change is underway with or without the participation of the staffers. Also, clear feedback loops throughout the chain of command so that crisper decision-making occurs.</p>
<p>The leadership must bring the people along for the ride and make them understand the importance of the change. Also, they need to assemble teams made up of good people who possess the ability to decide the next course of action.</p>
<h3>Restricted scope of collaboration</h3>
<p>Every stakeholder in the company must collaboration for DevOps so they develop a well-rounded perspective and address serious issues. However, many DevOps efforts focus only on operations and infrastructure, instead of looking at the bigger picture.</p>
<p>For optimizing customer value in the best way possible, DevOps teams need to involve other stakeholders and groups. The key lies in winning the support of an executive who sees the value that DevOps efforts are capable of delivering to the organization.</p>
<p>Allow this executive to align the incentives of the different groups within the company so that everyone stays on the same page.</p>
<h3>Poor environment for DevOps projects testing</h3>
<p>In order to implement DevOps successfully, organizations must maintain separation between the production and test environments. But test environments need to resemble the production infrastructure as much as possible.</p>
<p>In the case of DevOps projects, testing needs to begin early on in the development process. For that reason, organizations need to make sure that test environments have been established carefully in separate provider and hosting accounts than the ones being used for production.</p>
<p>If that’s not all, testing teams must also simulate the production environment to the closest possible degree since applications tend to perform differently during production and on the local machines.</p>
<h3>Improper metrics for assessing DevOps projects success</h3>
<p>Successful DevOps implementation comes with guaranteed faster delivery. But if that acceleration takes place without maintaining the same level of quality, then the DevOps program is nothing but a failure.</p>
<p>If your company wants to deploy DevOps, they need to use the correct metrics for understanding the project success and progress. Thus, it is necessary to take into account the metrics that align throughput success with velocity. When you consider the right set of metrics, be sure to drive intelligent automation decisions at the same time.</p>
<h3>DevOps projects: The big picture</h3>
<p>An organization that wants to develop, drive, and sustain DevOps success must concentrate on driving not only the collaboration across teams but also focus on the cultural mindset of the teams.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.bestdevops.com/why-do-your-devops-projects-fail-heres-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fostering DevOps Collaboration: Breaking Down the Wall Between Dev and Ops</title>
		<link>https://www.bestdevops.com/the-search-for-its-holy-grail-fostering-devops-collaboration/</link>
					<comments>https://www.bestdevops.com/the-search-for-its-holy-grail-fostering-devops-collaboration/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 07:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DevOps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DevOps Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BestDevOps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DevOps Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DevOps projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestdevops.com/?p=1689</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[DevOps collaboration is the real prize — not a new org chart. Learn practical steps to build trust, find allies, and sustain a genuine DevOps culture across development and operations teams.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Originally sourced from dev.to. Rewritten and expanded for a DevOps engineering audience.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">DevOps remains one of the most discussed concepts in modern software delivery — and for good reason. Done well, it promises faster response to business change, fewer single points of failure, and a healthier engineering culture overall. But the hardest part of any DevOps initiative is not the tooling. It is the people. Collaboration between Software Development and IT Operations is the real holy grail, and it is notoriously difficult to achieve when fear and distrust have calcified over years of siloed working.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This article distils practical advice for engineers and team leads who are trying to build or strengthen a DevOps culture in their organisation — from the first uncomfortable conversations all the way through to keeping the culture alive after the initial push.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">DevOps Is a Culture, Not an Org Chart</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A common early mistake is treating DevOps as a restructuring exercise — spinning up a new &#8220;DevOps team&#8221; and declaring victory. That approach misses the point entirely. DevOps is not a branch on your company&#8217;s organisational chart. It is a culture and a way of working that bridges Software Development, IT Operations, and often Security and Networking as well.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The philosophy is rooted in Agile thinking: people over process over tools. In a healthy DevOps culture, teams collaborate across the entire service lifecycle — from initial design through implementation, ongoing support, and eventual decommission. The hard boundaries that traditionally split tasks between Dev and Ops begin to blur. That blurring is intentional and productive, not a sign that roles are being erased.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why Collaboration Matters: The Business and Human Case</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Poor collaboration directly harms the outcomes of development projects — delayed releases, environment mismatches, last-minute fire-fighting, and blame cycles that erode morale. A genuine DevOps culture addresses these problems by enabling:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Faster software development</strong> — fewer handoff delays and clearer shared ownership</li>
<li><strong>More frequent delivery</strong> — smaller, safer releases rather than high-risk big-bang deployments</li>
<li><strong>Improved service quality</strong> — operational concerns are designed in from the start, not bolted on at the end</li>
<li><strong>Reduction of bottlenecks</strong> — shared responsibility removes the single-team gatekeeping that slows pipelines</li>
<li><strong>A holistic engineering environment</strong> — teams understand the full stack, not just their own slice</li>
<li><strong>Stronger working relationships</strong> — mutual respect replaces mutual suspicion</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Understanding the Fear on Both Sides</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before you can build trust, you need to understand what each side is actually afraid of. These fears are legitimate and worth taking seriously rather than dismissing.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">What Developers Fear</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Developers typically fear that the environments they build and test in will bear little resemblance to production. If that gap exists, any pre-release testing is effectively meaningless — bugs that only manifest in production become inevitable. This fear drives developers toward wanting control over environment configuration, which directly conflicts with traditional Ops ownership.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">What Operations Teams Fear</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">IT Operations teams typically fear that allowing developers to help configure environments will result in instability, inconsistency, and a clean-up burden that falls entirely on Ops. In the most entrenched cultures, each side quietly believes the other is trying to make their role redundant.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Surface These Fears Explicitly</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most effective approach is to surface these fears openly in early discussions — literally write them on sticky notes and put them on a shared whiteboard. Facilitate the conversation so that everyone understands where their colleagues are coming from. Then address each fear with concrete logic and proposed solutions. Leaving fears unspoken allows them to fester and undermine every subsequent collaboration attempt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Find and Activate Your Allies</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In almost every organisation, there are individuals on both the Dev and Ops sides who already believe in closer collaboration. They may not be the loudest voices in the room, but they exist. Identifying and connecting with these people early is one of the highest-leverage actions you can take.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meet with them informally. Agree on a consistent message about what DevOps collaboration looks like in your specific context, and commit to delivering that message with one voice regardless of who is asked. When the same idea is heard from multiple independent sources across different teams, it gains credibility and momentum far faster than when it comes from a single champion. Support your allies publicly and they will reciprocate.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Sell the Benefits to Individuals, Not Just the Organisation</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leadership buy-in is necessary but not sufficient. You also need individual engineers and team members to see what is in it for them personally. The pitch to the organisation — faster delivery, better quality — means little to someone who is worried about their role changing in ways they did not sign up for.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The individual-level benefits worth emphasising include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Access to new skills and cross-discipline training</li>
<li>Practical opportunities to apply those skills on real projects</li>
<li>Broader career development and increased market value</li>
<li>Recognition that their existing niche expertise is valued and not being replaced</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The goal is breadth of understanding, not demanding that every developer become a sysadmin or vice versa. A developer who understands deployment pipelines is more effective. An Ops engineer who understands how code is structured makes better infrastructure decisions. Neither needs to be an expert in the other&#8217;s full domain.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Choose and Implement Tools Together</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tooling comes after people and process — not before. Once the cultural groundwork is in place, the right tools will support and reinforce the new way of working. The critical point is that tools should be selected and implemented collaboratively, with input from both Dev and Ops teams. Imposing a toolchain on one team by the other replicates the same power dynamic you are trying to dissolve.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Prioritise tools that support:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Automation</strong> — removing repetitive manual steps that create friction and errors</li>
<li><strong>Continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD)</strong> — enabling fast, reliable pipelines from commit to production</li>
<li><strong>Process transparency</strong> — dashboards, shared logs, and alerting that both teams can see and act on</li>
<li><strong>Open communication</strong> — chat integrations, incident retrospectives, and shared documentation platforms</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Sustaining the Culture: It Is Never Truly Done</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Reaching a stable DevOps collaboration is a significant achievement, but it is not a finish line. Like any organisational culture, it requires ongoing maintenance. Existing relationships need to be nurtured. The values and practices that underpin the culture need to be communicated clearly to every new engineer who joins the organisation, before the old siloed habits reassert themselves.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The allies you identified and activated early in the process become permanent stewards of this culture. That is not a burden — it is recognition that collaborative cultures are built and maintained by people, not by process documents or tool selections alone. Guard that collaborative partnership deliberately and it will continue to deliver value long after the initial transformation effort has been forgotten.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Summary: A Practical DevOps Collaboration Checklist</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Reframe DevOps as a cultural shift, not an org restructure</li>
<li>Surface and address the specific fears held by Dev and Ops teams</li>
<li>Identify allies on both sides and align on a shared, consistent message</li>
<li>Sell individual benefits — skills growth, career breadth, job security — not just organisational outcomes</li>
<li>Select and implement tools collaboratively, after the people and process foundations are in place</li>
<li>Treat the culture as a living ecosystem that requires ongoing attention, especially as new people join</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.bestdevops.com/the-search-for-its-holy-grail-fostering-devops-collaboration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
