<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cloud licensing &#8211; Best DevOps</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.bestdevops.com/tag/cloud-licensing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.bestdevops.com</link>
	<description>Lets Learn, Do it &#38; Share! Thats a Best DevOps!!!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 05:13:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Google Cloud and AWS execs slam Microsoft over changes to cloud licensing</title>
		<link>https://www.bestdevops.com/google-cloud-and-aws-execs-slam-microsoft-over-changes-to-cloud-licensing/</link>
					<comments>https://www.bestdevops.com/google-cloud-and-aws-execs-slam-microsoft-over-changes-to-cloud-licensing/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 05:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google cloud]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestdevops.com/?p=6828</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Source: channelweb.co.uk Microsoft says customers will no longer be able to use their on-prem licences when moving to single-tenanted public [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Source: channelweb.co.uk</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Microsoft says customers will no longer be  able to use their on-prem licences when moving to single-tenanted  public cloud servers</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Senior execs from Google Cloud and Amazon Web Services (AWS) have 
slammed Microsoft over changes to how it charges customers using its 
software on other public clouds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft announced  that it would be changing how its customers can use their on-prem  licences on the dedicated servers from four cloud providers: AWS,  Alibaba, Amazon and Google, plus Microsoft itself.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It twinned the move with the announcement of its Azure Dedicated Host service.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Until now, customers have been able to use the same on-premise 
licence when moving a workload to a dedicated host in the public cloud, 
without paying any additional fees. This is because the single-tenant 
host is treated the same as a traditional outsourcing provider.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But customers will now have to pay additional fees from 1 October if 
they want to run Microsoft software on dedicated services from the 
listed providers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For some services, customers will be required to buy Microsoft&#8217;s 
Software Assurance package, or procure the software through the Service 
Provider License Agreement. They will not be able to bring their own 
licences.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are however discounts available for customers wanting to move 
from on-prem to Microsoft&#8217;s own Azure Dedicated Host, which has irked 
its competitors.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google Cloud president Robert Enslin slammed Microsoft on Twitter, 
accusing it of &#8220;vendor lock-in&#8221; and &#8220;taking its greatest hits from the 
‘90s to the cloud&#8221;.</p>



<blockquote style="text-align:center" class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow"><p>Shelf-ware. Complex pricing. And now vendor lock-in. Microsoft is taking its greatest hits from the &#8217;90s to the cloud. </p></blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AWS CTO Werner Vogels, meanwhile, accused Microsoft of &#8220;yet another bait and switch&#8221;.</p>



<blockquote style="text-align:center" class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow"><p>Yet another bait+switch by $MSFT,  eliminating license benefits to force MS use. 1st, MS took away BYOL  SQL Server on RDS, now no Windows upgrades w/BYOL on#AWS. Hard to trust a  co. who raises prices, </p></blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vogels&#8217; colleague, AWS VP Sandy Carter, published a blog on LinkedIn, accusing Microsoft of taking a leaf from the &#8220;old guard software vendor playbook&#8221;.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">She said that Microsoft has made a number of tweaks over recent years that have hampered AWS customers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&#8220;While these changes might not seem as restrictive as yet another 
threat of a software audit, this isn&#8217;t the first time Microsoft has made
 &#8216;subtle&#8217; changes to its licensing that are slowly chipping away at your
 options,&#8221; she said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&#8220;In 2018, Microsoft removed customer&#8217;s rights to bring your SQL 
Server licences to AWS and use them with our managed service, Amazon 
Relational Database Service.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&#8220;Microsoft wants you to believe that this is just &#8220;removal of 
outsourcing rights&#8221;, but Microsoft is looking to restrict what computer 
you can use. And what cloud.&#8221;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Microsoft&#8217;s rationale</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the moment, Microsoft customers are allowed to use the same 
licence if they want to move a workload from an on-prem environment to 
hardware managed by a traditional outsourcing firm.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Until now, this had also translated to single-tenanted public cloud 
servers &#8211; but Microsoft said this should not be the case because 
&#8220;dedicated hosted cloud services by major public cloud providers 
typically offer global elastic scale, on-demand provisioning and a 
pay-as-you-go model, similar to multi-tenant cloud services.&#8221;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&#8220;The emergence of dedicated hosted cloud services has blurred the 
line between traditional outsourcing and cloud services and has led to 
the use of on-premise licences on cloud services,&#8221; it said in a blog.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&#8220;As a result, we&#8217;re updating the outsourcing terms for Microsoft 
on-premise licences to clarify the distinction between 
on-premise/traditional outsourcing and cloud services and create more 
consistent licensing terms across multi-tenant and dedicated hosted 
cloud services.&#8221;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Customers now wanting to run Microsoft software on single-tenant 
cloud servers of AWS, Alibaba, Microsoft and Google will have to pay 
additional fees on top of the standard licensing. No other providers 
will be affected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, customers moving from on-prem to Microsoft&#8217;s own dedicated cloud server offering can save money by using its Azure Hybrid Benefit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft says customers can save up to 40 per cent on Azure Virtual 
Machines and 55 per cent on Azure SQL Database when running Windows 
Server virtual machines.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.bestdevops.com/google-cloud-and-aws-execs-slam-microsoft-over-changes-to-cloud-licensing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
